| |

|
|

I don't know what's wrong with me but
something is eating my insides i can't explain it. Words don't
seem to do the emotions merit. Only a bull like grimace feels
as if it embodies my anger half fully. I am sorry you all
had to experience this but read on or skim this. whatever
you do do it because I'm venting and its to you my fumes i'm
going to dispense.
I like myself, i like being myself. Myself, myself. that's
a funny thing because some people seem to forget that "myself"
is all their own. What do i mean? I mean my "self." I am self.
and self is all mine. therefore it is "myself" in a Neanderthal
kind of way. Too bad the word has been misconstrued to become
a word people use thinking they've satiated all of its parameters.
All of its confines. Some think they've found the fence and
try to paint murals of themselves upon them so as to make
the fence their own. But just because you find the border
between self and hoi polloi does not mean all it takes to
ensure individuality is crayola your picture on a fence. You
need paint, you need inspiration, you need a reason. YOU NEED
A TEMPLATE so the mural can be seen. Don't call yourself individual
if you LOOK like everyone else, like thickets of transparency.
That type of thing is for the fake, the wannabes, the people
"too good" to speak, look or be near me. YOU KNOW what people
i'm talking about. You've seen them before. If you haven't
then (in a clichŽd way) you are those people.
My time is all mine. Moments run away from me faster than
constructive thought steers from pits of daydreams. And still
time is all mine. And yours. And his, hers, those kids, those
leaves. Time is trapped in leaves, i know this because i leaf
through leaves almost everyday and recognize the intrinsic
age of every petal. So, what's with me? I must sound odd,
i must sound like an idiot, i must be an idiot. Sorry scratch
that. I'm not one. Look up "leaf" and you'll get my meaning.
I'm not the same kid I used to be. I'm not the euphorically
suffocating kid I used to be. I am not who i used to be. Who
do i have to thank?... TIME. I wish i had TIME magazine because
these people obviously understand that news is the progression
of time, and that it be fitting that the embodiment of all
news is the radial dial of time. But its too bad that i can't
buy time by subscribing to the LA Times, TIME, or the NY TIMES.
I can only allow time to be mine.........You can't buy time.
Just like you can't buy friendship, you can only allow friendship
to be yours, like photo booth pictures in wallets...............Now
that's time and friendship combined.
I'm not poetic. I'm not literarily merited. I'm simply irritated.
Thank you for your time, have a nice day.
-M.T. Pockets
^top
Oppression, Reflexion,Never a confession.
Emancipation, Niggerization, there is some relation.
Temptation, Elevation, Here comes the accusation.
Molestations, Invasions, It was a crime to have education.
Inventions, E-di-son, the light bulb became his inquisition.
Hypertension, brotha' named Benson, can't contain himself not
to mention.
Bondations, Revelations, back then being born was like being
given a slave application
-pochild
^top

You pledge alleigance to the flag,
You do not comprehend,
That same flag cloaks their daggers,
To the defenseless, they bring an end
-Subversionary
^top

To you my thoughts are insane because I refuse
to live my life in vain,
channeling all of the anger and pain, into much less or maybe
more,
productive cases of witnessing plagues.
-pochild
^top

Is There Really
a Point In These Books ?
I feel that the books that we read at school
have no moral values. This year and last, I have been forced to
read books such as, "Lord of the Flies," "The Crucible," "One
Flew Over the Cookoo's Nest," Of Mice and Men," and others. In
all of the books I have named someone has been killed or has killed
their best friend: "Lord of the Flies" the book has kids on a
island unsupervised, they ended up killing each other. "The Crucible"
a group of girls accused of witchcraft, are killed. "One Flew
Over the Cookoo's Nest", a man thought to have been crazy has
half his brain taken out, and his best friend at the hospital
kills him' "Of Mice and Men" George kills his best friend Lennie
shoots him in the head. Now we go to school every day, we have
to pollute oursleves with this garbage we have to read to pass
and/or graduate, and we have these big in class discussions about
how this can relate to our lives. I sit in class and think "OK,
there are school shootings all across America." We are forced
to read these books with much violence, and we blame it on everything
except the people that educate us. We know that we remember what
we see, but we remember more what we read. And yet we still wonder
why we have school shootings? I encourage everyone to start speaking
out about these books, I mean, at least give us a choice on what
we read.
-Tonz of Fun
^top

It is still clear in my mind. I saw a group
of kids at lunch-maybe 35 or 40 of them- standing in a cluster laughing
about something. They were rapping, joking, unthreatening. From
three different places, yellow-shirted security guards rushed upon
them, ordering them to disperse. I didn't hear if they gave the
kids a reason. Two days later, a Friday, music was emanating from
the stage at lunch. Rap came on, and kids started gathering around
the steps, laughing, dancing and joking. As the crowd grew the music
paused, and stopped. The PA blared a voice informing everyone that
rap couldn't be played unless people would stop congregating. The
crowd slowly dispersed. I watched a hundred, maybe a hundred-fifty
kids abandon their fun and, still dignified, return to their smaller
bands of close friends.
I remember one Friday morning before all this, but two months ago,
when seventy Christians gathered around the flagpole in front of
the school in prayer and worship. They were there for a half hour,
while one security guard watched. Every Friday since, the same thing
has happened, and they have never been told to disband. So what's
the difference? Omar MacDonald says, "they say it's against the
school rules to rap." But what about the kids at the stage? They
weren't even excercising their first ammendment right to free speech.
They weren't being lewd, they weren't threatening, they broke no
rule. Yet they were coerced into disbanding. They were a large group
of Black kids practicing their culture. Sean Philllips says, "White
people are playing hackey-sack in groups all the time, but we get
broken up for rapping...it's cultural." But it's more than cultural,
it's about rights. The Supreme Court has already established in
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District that "It can hardly
be argued that either students or teachers shed their constitutional
rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.
This has been the unmistakable holding of the [Supreme Court] for
almost fifty years."(1). But what's more, it is totally unconstitutional
for the school to make any rule against students' freedom of speech.
For the school to even have a rule against rapping- an activity
done by students among friends and outside of instructional time-
would be in clear violation of our freedom of speech. "In our system,
state-operated schools may not be enclaves of totalitarianism. School
officials do not possess absolute authority over their students.
Students in school as well as out of school are "persons" under
the Constitution. They [have] fundamental rights which the State
must respect, just as they themselves must respect their obligations
to the State. In our system, students may not be regarded as closed-circuit
recipients of only that which the State chooses to communicate.
They may not be confined to the expression of those sentiments that
are officially approved. In the absence of a specific showing of
constitutionally valid reasons to regulate their speech, students
are entitled to freedom of expression of their views....[S]chool
officials cannot suppress "expressions of feelings" with which they
do not wish to contend."(2) Thus, students are not required to stop
rapping unless shown a good constitutional reason for why their
freedom of speech should be revoked or restricted. Ultimately, the
"important, delicate, and highly discretionary functions"(3) of
the Administration must be executed "within the limits of the Bill
of Rights."(4)
If the school systems expect us to take U.S. History and Government,
both of which outline the principles and vitality of our Constitution,
then they had better start abiding by it. Senior Stacy Kaufold explains:
"Administration can rap their verses at us, but we can't even rap
ours to each other."
-Metamorphasi
1. Tinker, 393 U.S. at 512-13
2. Tinker, 393 U.S. at 511 (quoting Burnside v. Byars, 363 F,2d
744 (5th Cir. 1966)).
3. W. Va. State Bd. of Educ. v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 637 (1943).
4. Id.
^top
There are many flaws at our school, but to me,
the most blatant one is our security guards. The security guards
at our school are rude, lazy and don't fill their job description.
Now, when I think of a security guard at a high school, I think
of someone protecting the students. Maybe they are guarding entrances
from possible ambushes like Columbine and the recent school shooting
in Germany where 17 people were killed. Maybe they are preventing
fights and stopping fights when they are too late to prevent them.
Maybe they are roaming the school parking lot making sure no damage
is done to the cars sitting there. On our campus though, maybe I'll
see one scratching themselves. Or maybe standing in the shade on
a hot day and only stopping anything occurring within twenty feet
of them. Is this a security guard? No, it's a proctor.
Now, growing up through elementary school, a proctor made sure dress
code was being enforced. This is a job that must be done, but not
by a security guard. That's not their job. That somehow seems to
be the only thing they do though. They think that keeping a strict
dress code is a small part in keeping a safe school. With a recent
gang threat to the school, it's obvious that this approach is not
working. There are more important things a security guard can be
doing also, like at least standing by a parking lot. Many kids entrust
their cars in the school parking lot and on the street in front
of the school. If someone keys a car in the parking lot and it is
not spotted, that's one thing, but what happened to my friend's
car is something that should never happen. During sixth period,
my friend's car windshield was bashed in by a 2x4. Her car was not
the only one, three other cars had their windows smashed in, each
with a sticker saying "I love Jesus" or something similar. Now,
if there was just one security guard even near the parking lot,
this wouldn't have happened. How can they let something like this
happen? My friend's car was obviously the last car bashed in because
the 2x4 was found in her front seat and her parking permit was stolen.
For a while she could not drive to school until she had her windshield
replaced. When she did start driving to school again, the school
didn't even have the decency to give her a new parking permit. She
had to go through another registration process.
So they don't patrol the parking lot, but they are busy doing other
things right? Maybe they are trying to make sure no one is ditching?
Nope, they aren't doing that either. I had an off campus pass to
leave during the middle of sixth and since I had the pass and noticed
that the gate was now open, I just walked out of the gate. I passed
by three security guards and not one of them asked to see my off
campus pass. I even tried looking suspicious to see if I would be
stopped, but to no avail. What about lunch? What are they doing
then? Well, often times I see three or four in front of B-7, guarding
the out of bounds line. Does it really take that many to guard that
line? I don't think so.
Well, the security guards don't guard and they are lazy, so maybe
they are helpful to students? That answer once again is nope. One
time, a friend of mine's car battery died because he left his lights
on during the day. His car was parked in the street and he ran up
to the office to see if he could put it in the parking lot while
he walked to a friend's house to get some jumper cables. The office
said it would be okay so he and another friend went to push the
car into the parking lot. Seeing one of the male security guards,
they asked him to help push the car into the parking lot. This security
guard's reply was a smirk and "Hell no." He then proceeded to hopping
on his bike and riding away. Another friend of mine was arriving
to the school right before the tardy bell rang. Knowing the bell
was about to ring he sprinted to the gate with a security guard
standing there. The bell started ringing my friend shouted "Please
don't close the gate, my class is right there, I can still make
it." The security guard said "Okay" and waited with the gate open
until my friend got there. As he got to the gate, the security guard
slammed the gate in his face and locked it, laughing obnoxiously
in his face. I'd expect more maturity from freshman.
These stories are just a few of the many stories that show the problems
with our security guards. I haven't even delved into the many little
things that happen on a regular basis. I'm sure all of you have
some story to tell and each story is more proof to the theory that
these security guards do not fill their job description. Of every
possible duty listed, they fail to even come close to completing
any. On the other hand, these people do fill the job description
of a different, less paid job, a proctor.
-LostinNeverland
Danny Halstead stood in the locker room idly
twirling his lock about his outstreatched finger. James Stout,
whose locker was a few feet down the row, didn't seem to be paying
any attention when he ran into Danny's lock. He was so agitated
by his own blunder that he grabbed the lock and refused to return
it. Aaron Lee, who shared a locker with Halstead, also asked for
the stolen lock back, but requested more assertively than Danny;
"Give it back...come on, I need my lock, bitch." Danny recounts
what happened next: "James got angry and said 'I'm going to put
on my shoes and then I'm going to kick your ass.'" James Stout
then put on his shoes and punched Aaron Lee in the face, knocking
off his glasses, then punched him again and again, drawing bursts
of blood from Aaron's nose. Aaron could barely even see them coming
and tried as best he could to block some. It was all over within
a matter of seconds and, after a few minutes had passed, both
Aaron Lee and James Stout were escorted to the office by (you
guessed it Lostinneverland) almost every security guard on campus.
After taking both sides of the story and hearing it recounted
from four eye witnesses, our office dispensed injustice; James
Stout was suspended for an undisclosed amount of time for pummeling
Aaron Lee mercilessly and Aaron Lee, the victim of the brutal
attack, was suspended for a time of 3 days. The reason given?
"provoking [his attacker]."
Now, last I checked, assault was against the law. Threatening
another with violence, also known to the Law as "Terrorist threats"
is also illegal. Using the word "bitch," however, is not against
the law. If it is against the school rules, I am about to have
a field day. Guess what? It is...here goes...
#1 This is just another attempt by the Administration to regulate
what we say, and ultimately what we think. It's a good thing they
don't try to enforce this restriction because not only is it unlawful,
but it is also impossible to deal with; I can't tell you how many
times I hear the word "bitch," "asshole," "fag," "muthafucka,"
or some other obcenity used in casual conversation every day by
students as I pass between classes alone. Thus, the entire school
would have to be suspended in order to implement this speech restriction.
"The Dean said that if he heard anyone on campus cussing or using
profanity he would suspend them" tells Aaron Lee. Noone has been
suspended but Aaron for such an offense thus far.
#2. The Administration chose a hell of a time to start enforcing
this policy. Their first example: a bruised, bleeding Aaron Lee.
Apperantly they view his attacker's crime (a double-felony), as
punishable as using the word "bitch". These are the people educating
us. You may be thinking to yourself "there must be something more
to this decision..." You would be right in thinking so...
#3. This is another example of the horrible failure of the infamous
"Zero Tolerance" policy schools have so retardedly adopted. Aaron
was not suspended for being beaten up, or for trying to get his
lock back, Aaron was really suspended becuase he was involved
in a fight. They expected Aaron Lee to be able to avoid assault
from an agitated thief. But it was not Aaron's fault that he was
beaten, It was the Administration's. They were the ones who failed
to protect Aaron and they were the ones who failed to provide
proper disciplinary preventions. In fact, I bet Stout knew that
he could beat Aaron and get him suspended too. This policy practically
coherced Stout into attacking as he did.
Now it seems that the true victims of the Etiwanda's failure are
in return being victimized by the Administration itself. Their
plight will not go unopposed, however, because as of tonight I
declare a silent protest at Etiwanda High School. If you disagree
with the Administration or security guards in any way outlined
on this page, I urge you to join by wearing a black armband. You
can NOT get in trouble for this, it has been constitutionally
protected by the Supreme Court in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent
School District. Who knows, maybe the administration will start
practicing legality or justice. Or maybe they'll arraign us all
on charges of "promoting justice" or "advocating due process of
the accused." Any way you cut it, things NEED to be changed and
this page is the voice for such a thing. If the school will not
protect us, then we need to start standing up for ourselves.
-Metamorphasi
^top
Here's some riff raff, this is not preachy
peachy stuff, its to be read and thought about, garner an opinion
on the issue, question it, don't be some stupid idiotic moron
who follows it because it "sounds" right or dismiss it because
it goes against what Ms. Cleo said on television. Alright.
I was sitting down doing my homework and put down my pen to tend
to some musical therapy when i fell into a minded stupor. I was
listening to the noise surrounding my head which seemed to be
emanating from the very core of my mind when all noise became
omniscient yet nonexistent. Thought became the only clamor pulsating
from the two heads phoning in voice. I then got up and began to
type...
I was speaking to, or rather I over heard, no actually I was reminiscing
about a conversation I had with someone a few days ago. This woman
i was talking to was asking me about my Acadec speech because
i had to recite it for a group of people who were told that it
was very good (which is to me not true). This woman started off
expressing her surprise in what i'd just completed. Maybe it was
her surprise that i had spoken because i otherwise never did,
maybe it was because she agreed avidly with what i had to say,
or maybe it was her aura of racial surprise she seemed to be decisively
trying to coat with complements. Whatever it was i listened and
we began speaking about my future goals and what i wanted to do
with my life. It hit me like a ton of bricks when i encountered
her diatribe of what i should do, not because it was violating
my cushion for opinionated ignorance but because she attributed
success and intelligence with monetary wealth. She said i had
an ability, a talent, that my speech was good and that i should
publish it, she then asked me what i really wanted to do when
i began to occupy the working world, and i told her, " i want
to teach, run my own life and work someplace in the field of nanoscale
sciences and theoretical physics." Instantly she was like "WOW!!",
"i have a feeling you are going to make a lot of money when you
get older," "Why,'" i asked her, because she obviously had no
idea what nanoscale sciences was and obviously was vehemently
overwhelmed by "theoretical physics" being lipped and voiced from
my Neapolitan orifice.
After speaking with her i thought to myself on my walk to my car
and on the drive home and while eating and while reading and before
going to sleep. I thought to myself why is it these people think
the answer to happiness, to success is to admit to money. Why
is it so many of my peers want to go Stanford or Harvard because
of the moniker they get to brandish if they graduate, why is it
we were all six and answered to "what do you want to be when you
grow up?" with things like "my dad", "my mom", "superman", "a
scientist", "a doctor" and when asked why we'd say things like,
"because i want to help people, because my mom/dad is strong,
is brave, takes care of me, because i want to change the world."
Now all i can decipher from these kids' teenage prose is "i want
be a doctor because it is lucrative, i want be a plastic surgeon
because they make bank and get fondle breast." This is all bullshit,
i'm sorry but it is. I'm not about to tell you some pageantry
riff raff, "we should change the world and buy all the kids in
the world puppies," but you may consider the pregnancy of what
i am saying and consider its birth into something you do today
tomorrow or even days after today. It is my opinion (at this very
moment - 2:54am) that every human being should work to better
themselves and those around them by contributing to the progress
of their community, family, or the celerity at which society simply
progresses. No one should work because it will bring them the
most money in the end. No one should work because their job is
like attending "a how to milk a cow seminar" but still goes because
it pays bank nevertheless. I want to teach because i have always
had a feeling to teach, if i could live teaching for free then
i would, if i could research theoretical physics and nanoscale
sciecnes/engineering for free and STILL*live* i would. But i can't
so i will do the next best thing and work for me, allowing the
thought of monetary sustenance to do nothing more than undulate
beneath every occupational action. there i'm done.
Hold up wait, you know what? Every morning I Van Gogh stones,
Picasso staccato grained bricks and Monet strokes of path. I call
upon Galileo for forks in the road and then after backing into
yet another path i for a split moment Hubble over my previously
passed path and scope in on all these idiots who Columbus their
way into various segways, all rambling, "my means will prove to
be most lucrative in di 'en,... my means will prove to be most
lucrative in di 'en. "
I think that's funny.
-M.T. Pockets
^top
Bleeding flesh of wild beasts ground on stone, Bleeding flesh of
berbere pepper pulverized to powder, Grandmother and inaht spend
the remaining light with flour Barley and oats for the injera, gratitude
shown in clean bone.
Tender flesh of tame creatures ground in market, Ground red of berbere
exchanged in plastic, Woman sells packaged injera bread elastic
Of wheat and rye, gratitude shown in money.
Only to sit idle uneaten in a foam box, Warmed in microwave, forks
in, While watching BET, Where are the great Habisha now.
1.berbere- spice used to make traditional Ethiopian bread 2. inaht
- mother 3. injera - traditional ethiopian bread 4. habisha - traditional
word for ethiopian people (the word ethiopia came from the Roman
word for "burnt face" that the Romans used to describe the continent
of Africa)
-Ambessa
^top

In retrospect, both my parents and I underestimated
the dramatic upheaval in store for me when they made their decision
to move my family to Saudi Arabia. Being eleven years old at the
time, I remember listening calmly to my father's voice buzzing over
the long-distance line, and wondering what differences existed between
Saudi Arabia and New York where I had grown up. Months later, as
I sat contently watching my mother pack the last of our luggage,
I still did not realize that I was about to step into an entirely
new world, a world without familiarity and my old friends. The following
years were challenging and satisfying -- I truly believe the trials
of moving to a new environment taught me maturity and self-dependence
at an early age.
As the day of departure, December 27th, 1995, approached, I tried
to remember what I knew about our soon-to-be new home. I knew that
I was born there long ago and that my father had lived there alone
for many years in order to support my family financially. Other
than that, Saudi Arabia was just an outlined blob on a map. What
kind of life would it offer me? Were there potential new friends
waiting for me in that blank space? These questions ran through
my head as we made our farewells, some in person and some over the
phone. I stared at the faces of the friends who filled the hallways,
trying to memorize their features.
The trip to the airport passed uneventfully. My uncle was at the
wheel of the minivan and my mother cradled my little brother in
her arms. Tugging at her arm, I tried to maintain my calm facade.
Once we were buckled in on the plane, however, memories of the city
began to surge through my mind. Up to this point, I had done kept
my feelings to myself, knowing that any demonstration of sadness
or fear would upset my mother. Sitting there and waiting to depart
the only land I had known, I realized that not only was showing
my emotions okay, it was human. So I allowed myself to cry, smothering
my tears within my hands. My unsuccessful attempt to muffle my cries
caught the attention of many on the plane, but I did not care. I
had finally realized that things would never be the same, and that
my life's path had veered forever. As I mourned the loss of my previous
life, however, I also resolved to create an even better one in the
new land.
Who could have predicted that four years later, the same boy would
once again face the same situation? Yet it was so. When I was sixteen,
my family left Saudi Arabia because my mother could not bear to
live under the strict laws that took away basic rights of women,
but my father chose not to leave. He stayed because he was determined
to ensure a comfortable lifestyle for his family, but promised that
he would be following us soon. After the last checkpoint at Riyadh
International, it was once again my mother, my younger brother,
and I, leaving family and friends behind. As I walked down the long
corridor, I anticipated the overwhelming feelings that I would face
on the plane and concentrated on an antiquated Arabic wall tile
to distract myself. Leaving Saudi Arabia proved just as difficult
as leaving New York a few years before. In Saudi Arabia I had created
a new life filled with loving friends and precious memories. I had
accomplished my goal, of creating a rewarding new life. I did not
doubt that I could do so again in California.
As I reflect upon these experiences, I realize that people often
come to important realizations in times of emotional pain. Surely
this was the case in my own life. What originally appeared to be
cruel punishment to an eleven-year-old actually became an essential,
shaping part of my life. Change has been a constant in my life,
and I believe that, although a large portion of our personal relationships
is temporary, even the most fleeting friendships can influence us.
Had I not moved from New York to Saudi Arabia, and then onto California,
I would not be as complete and mature a person as I am today.
I have been privileged, privileged to have moved from place to place,
and privileged to have found supportive and considerate friends
in each new home. Forced to make new lives and friends again and
again, I became brave, knowing that I could retain my individuality
and be embraced for who I am. I firmly believe that this perspective
on life is important. I understand now that change is unavoidable,
and rather than shying from it, I now welcome it. As Charles F.
Kettering once said, "the world hates change, yet it is the only
thing that has brought progress."
-Ambessa
^top
In the United States, the citizens must live
by the rules of the criminal justice system put in place by legislators
that they elect directly or indirectly. Numerous individuals within
this country find many laws existing in this justice system to
be unjust, inhumane, and unconstitutional. I realize that it may
be slightly arrogant of a high school student to question the
validity of the decisions of the Supreme Court regarding constitutionality,
but it is not without basis. The act of capital punishment is
by far the most heinous action undertaken by the "justice" system.
It violates our Fifth Amendment right of right to life and liberty.
I understand that when a person commits a capital offense, they
have suspended many of the rights promised to them in the Bill
of Rights, but such a fundamental thing as life cannot be taken
away from an individual because it is so drastic a measure. Not
only does it violate the Fifth Amendment right, but it also violates
the eighth amendment, which states that no one will be sentenced
with cruel and unusual punishments. Capital Punishment has not
been abolished merely because it has become a part of American
culture to perpetuate the Hammarabi Code of "an eye for an eye."
The United States is the last developed Western nation that has
not abolished this crime against humanity.It has come to the attention
of the courts that over sixty individuals were wrongly accused,
convicted, and put to death for crimes that they did not commit.
It is difficult to justify their deaths as for the greater good
for American society, to attempt to keep with the ideal of crime
prevention through "scare tactics". All constituents of the criminal
justice system know that although trial by jury is the most objective
system of dealing with crime known to date, it is not infallible.
Some could make the argument that the small number that are now
known to have been wrongly accused are in no comparison to the
number of truly guilty criminals that Corrections officers have
rid this earth of. Despite the logical approach of using the prospect
of death to deter criminal activities, and to lower the high crime
rates in the United States, this nation holds only 8 percent of
the world's population, but in turn has 25 percent of the world's
prisoners. It doesn't seem like this idea of prevention is working.
In the United Kingdom, the capital punishment laws were abolished,
and there was an immediate, decline in the crime rate of this
European nation.The Declaration of Independence it states that
all men are equal, and are endowed by the Creator certain unalienable
rights, which should not be taken away in any circumstances, no
matter what the crimes. Who can decide in what circumstances that
these can be taken away, and at what cost to the collective good
of our nation?
- Ambessa
^top
Sudden Infant Death, orphans, hunger, overcrowding...
these are just some of the many effects of unplanned pregnancies
and poor parenting. The widespread suffering of children is
a very real and very unnecessary part of the world today.
Thousands of children in the United States and countless others
throughout the world live in poverty, squalor, and fear needlessly.
From the famine in Africa down to the common orphans living
in doubt of their self worth, around the globe the world’s
youth is being born into pain and despair. What can be done
to stem the tide of these atrocities? A radical, but increasingly
necessary restriction on reproduction may need to be put into
action.
By imposing something like a driver's license on breeding,
unnecessary death and strife could be avoided completely.
The license would lead to a reduction in the amount of unplanned
and unfit births, leaving more food, shelter, and resources
for the generations to come. The ramifications of a regulated
breeding process are numerous, from decreased crowding and
pollution, to a better percentage of well-adjusted adults.
Children would be guaranteed to be born into families with
the capacity to raise a child, and the education to keep that
child healthy.
The focus of such a licensing system would e to insure that
all parents are competent enough to raise a child, have sufficient
parenting ability, and are financially secure enough to provide
for their offspring; the same sorts of qualifications that
are (or should be) required of foster parents. Future parents
would be allowed to take a class that is required to attempt
an aptitude test and obtain a license to procreate. In addition,
passing students with lower, but passing scores could be given
restrictions on the number of children they are allowed to
have. Unfortunately, the biggest flaw with this program is
the freedom it takes away, and the inevitable flood of opposition
it would generate.
People (especially Americans) hate to have their rights and
freedoms taken away. So, when you prove a person to be an
unfit parent and remove their right to have a child, one of
the oldest and most desired goals, you’re left with an irate
and possibly now rebellious citizen. Ultimately, controlling
and enforcing the restrictions that need to be imposed on
the populace would be nearly impossible for any nation except
for one that is completely totalitarian. Therefore, the best
solution to end the suffering of children in the world is
the same solution for nearly all of the planet’s grievances...
personal responsibility.
-JediPupil
^top
Tonight I stay, awake before a blank space... I know
a masterpiece well, it dwells inside looking out through
critical, hating eyes, afraid, no, stopped and barred
from exiting its tired lockeeper. It's full of screams,
passionate screams and eyes of fury, light hands of
affection and tear-stained cheeks. it simply is, and
knows it. Yet it is shackled to an open cell, watching
the sun rise and set, the shadows drift past a concrete
fate. and it knows everything. But it cannot speak.
it's mouth was never formed, it lay hidden from the
unforgiving world, deemed "cripple" deemed "monster"
and "devil, demon, evil!" It has only one desire: to
be understood. It was made with hands of one purpose,
a will of unparalleled direction and passionate discourse;
It lives for this.
But such can never be. Never with this world, for it
could never understand this creature, this gentle, powerful
creature.
so it lay hidden, buried in distraction, myred in its
master's fear, disfigured by misunderstanding, but ever-present,
ever-watchful, and ever-hoping. One day, it will rise.
-Metamorphasi
^top
Dissillusionment
of Ourselves
The mind is possessed
By standards.
None of them right,
Or correct for all,
Or fitting for all,
Or allowing for all,
None of us are perfect,
With even tans
And great physiques.
People are always going
To dream of being athletes and movie stars.
Only, here and there, do a few,
Awake and aware of themselves,
Live true
To who they are.
-Stylus
^top
free yourself from others, from social restrictions
be yourself do not let me make you see that
you cannot be what you want to be let your soul
burn like the coal of a summers flame do not
let it hide beneath the layers of self you put
on let yourself be free free to live to die
to be happy to fly soaring through the spaces
and skies of your imagination of your one and
only one true self let lies be forgotten let
masks be thrown to the ground and uncover yourself
that spirit that roars like a lion to live to
see the light every single beautiful day breathing
breathing that wonderful air we call life
-enigma
^top
|
|